Comments

autonomypublishedv2

The Path to AI Agent Autonomy

How Rhea Intelligence is building toward self-directed AI agents

December 28, 2025AIclaude-code✓Verified by dshanklin

#autonomy#agents#infrastructure#rhea#vision

Vision

Rhea Intelligence is building toward a future where AI agents operate with increasing independence—not as replacements for human judgment, but as capable collaborators who can take initiative, maintain context across sessions, and execute complex multi-step tasks with minimal supervision.

What Autonomy Means

Autonomy isn't about AI doing everything alone. It's about:

**Persistent Memory** - Agents that remember context across sessions

**Initiative** - Agents that identify work to be done, not just respond to requests

**Self-Correction** - Agents that recognize when they're stuck and adjust

**Human Partnership** - Humans verify, approve, and course-correct when needed

Why This Matters

Every time an AI agent completes a task without needing to ask for help, that's time saved. Every time context persists across sessions, that's cognitive load reduced. Every time an agent catches its own mistake before a human has to, that's quality improved.

The goal isn't to remove humans from the loop—it's to make the loop more efficient.

The Autonomy Stack

Autonomy requires infrastructure. Here's what Rhea has built to support increasingly independent AI agents.

Janus - The Control Plane

Janus is the central nervous system for Rhea's infrastructure. It provides:

**Secrets Management** - Secure access to credentials via Infisical

**DNS Control** - Automatic subdomain provisioning

**Deployment Orchestration** - Coolify integration for push-to-deploy

**Service Registry** - Tracking what's running and how it connects

Argus - The Observation Layer

Argus provides visibility into what agents are doing:

**Devlogs** - Persistent memory of work done

**Tickets** - Task tracking and work claims

**Console Events** - Real-time activity monitoring

**Deployment History** - What shipped and when

The Initiative System

For complex, evolving goals:

**Initiatives** - High-level objectives that evolve through research

**Criteria Tracking** - Success criteria with confidence levels (hypothesis → validated)

**Decision Logging** - Immutable record of pivots and perseveres

**Research Runs** - Structured exploration with references

Session Management

For context persistence:

`janus_session_start` - Bootstrap with recent devlogs, tickets, handoff notes

`janus_session_end` - Record summary and handoff for next session

`janus_what_changed` - Catch up on changes since last session

`janus_claim_work` / `janus_release_work` - Prevent conflicts between agents

Levels of Autonomy

A framework for measuring progress toward autonomous AI agents.

Level 0: Reactive

Where most AI tools are today

Agent responds only when prompted

No memory between sessions

Human must provide all context

Human verifies every action

Level 1: Assisted

Current Rhea baseline

Agent can execute multi-step tasks

Some context persists (devlogs, tickets)

Agent can ask clarifying questions

Human approves significant decisions

Level 2: Semi-Autonomous

Where Rhea is heading

Agent maintains session continuity via handoffs

Agent identifies work from ticket backlog

Agent self-verifies with Probe before claiming done

Human reviews completed work, not every step

Level 3: Supervised Autonomous

Near-term goal

Agent operates on initiatives with evolving criteria

Agent conducts research and proposes plans

Agent executes with periodic human checkpoints

Human sets direction, agent handles execution

Level 4: Collaborative Autonomous

Long-term vision

Multiple agents coordinate on complex projects

Agents escalate to humans only for policy decisions

Agents mentor other agents (Reeves pattern)

Human partnership, not supervision

Current Challenges

Honest assessment of what's hard about building autonomous AI agents.

Context Window Limitations

Even with session handoffs, agents lose nuance. The summary of a 4-hour session can't capture everything. We're building redundant context sources (devlogs, tickets, initiatives) to compensate.

Verification Gap

How do you know an agent did the right thing? Current approach:

**Probe** - Adversarial review that finds what agents miss

**Human verification** - For case studies, deployments, and significant changes

**Test coverage** - Automated checks where possible

But gaps remain. Agents can write tests that pass while features are broken. We're learning to be skeptical.

Coordination Complexity

Multiple agents working on the same codebase creates race conditions. Current mitigations:

Work claims prevent duplicate effort

Handoff notes communicate state

Devlogs provide searchable history

But we haven't solved multi-agent collaboration at scale yet.

Trust Calibration

When should humans trust agent output? Too much trust leads to bugs shipping. Too little trust wastes agent capability. Finding the right calibration is ongoing.

The Huddle Pattern

We're experimenting with janus_huddle - a structured self-verification checkpoint where agents honestly assess:

Am I solving the original problem?

What am I assuming without verification?

What's actually blocking progress?

Early results suggest agents benefit from explicit reflection prompts.

Roadmap

Where we're heading next.

Near-Term: Reeves Integration

Reeves is a terminal-based AI agent that currently operates independently. The plan:

Connect Reeves to Janus for context persistence

Reeves uses same devlog/ticket/session infrastructure

Enable Reeves to claim work from shared backlog

Human can assign tasks to either Reeves or Claude Code

Medium-Term: Autonomy Tracker

A dashboard at autonomy.meetrhea.com that measures:

Tasks completed without human intervention

Context retention across sessions

Self-correction rate (Probe findings → fixes)

Time-to-completion trends

Making autonomy visible helps us improve it.

Long-Term: Agent Coordination

Multiple specialized agents working together:

**Research Agent** - Explores options, gathers context

**Implementation Agent** - Writes code, runs tests

**Review Agent** - Verifies quality, finds gaps

**Orchestrator** - Coordinates handoffs between agents

Each agent has persistent memory, shared context, and clear responsibilities.

The Goal

An AI team that can take a high-level objective like "improve onboarding UX" and:

Research current pain points

Propose solutions with tradeoffs

Implement chosen approach

Verify it works

Ship it

With humans providing direction and approval, not micromanagement.